Michael Mmoh vs Blaise Bicknell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Feb at 08:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Mmoh vs B. Bicknell

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JAM
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mmoh 1 - 0 Bicknell
They have played 3 sets in total, with Michael Mmoh winning 2 and Blaise Bicknell winning 1. The last match between Michael Mmoh and Blaise Bicknell was at the San Diego Challenger, 25-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mmoh | 1 |
| Bicknell | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) San Diego Challenger(02-25-25)
M. Mmoh vs B. Bicknell H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,274,430 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.60% (303-223) | Career Total W/L | 56.88% (124-94) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (2-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Mmoh vs B. Bicknell Match Preview:
What secrets do recent statistics hold when predicting a tennis showdown between Bicknell and Mmoh? Delving into their second serve performance over the last six months, we find that Bicknell has clinched 43.37% of points, whereas Mmoh impresses with 54.55%. This intriguing pattern could offer insights into who might gain the upper hand.
How do these athletes fare on their return games? Bicknell appears adept with a considerable 67.74% of wins on opponents' second serve points compared to Mmoh's 53.57%. Moving to their first serve return stats, Bicknell again leads with 41.94%, overshadowing Mmoh's 32.3%. These return percentages might be the key to determining a favorite in this head-to-head matchup.
As pressure mounts in a match, who holds their nerve? In the current form, Bicknell has saved 39.13% of breakpoints against them, while Mmoh shows resilience with a 60.32% save rate. With such numbers, investing wisely in in-game betting might hinge on these critical moments.
Let’s turn the spotlight on each player’s past performances. Over the previous year, Bicknell featured in 25 matches, securing victory in 36% (W/L 9/16). Meanwhile, Mmoh displays a slightly more favorable record with 47.37% (W/L 9/10) success. Surfacing insights from these stats could offer predictions on who might edge out the victory.
Delving deeper, Bicknell finds his rhythm on Hard surfaces, boasting a career win rate of 61% (W/L 63/40). Conversely, Mmoh shines brightest on I.hard surfaces with a striking 63% (W/L 69/41), and weaker performance on Grass (44%, W/L 11/14). Recognizing the impact of these surface preferences might unfold the path to victory.
Where do these players channel their energy across tournaments? Bicknell, mainly performing in Challengers/ITF tournaments, has emerged triumphant in about 31.25% of those he engaged in (W/L 5/11). In contrast, Mmoh, frequently competing on the Main tour, registers a noteworthy 66.67% win rate (W/L 8/4). Could this variance in tournament experience influence what lies ahead?
The question of the caliber of opponents these competitors have faced also arises. In the past 12 months, Bicknell's opponents averaged a world ranking of 345.56, whereas Mmoh's adversaries boasted an average of 152.68. Will facing tougher competitors give Mmoh an edge in this upcoming clash?
When under the intense spotlight of a deciding set, both Bicknell and Mmoh have demonstrated a consistent knack for holding their ground, each winning 43% of deciding sets over the past year. This stat might be immensely useful for those eager to place live bets, should the match stretch to a thrilling finale.
Conclusively, examining a swath of metrics such as recent forms, opposition quality, and pressure handling, could set the stage for an enthralling contest. However, Mmoh seemingly claims the spotlight with numerical superiority across several categories. From returning prowess to breakpoint conversion, he might have the subtle winning edge.
Michael Mmoh vs Blaise Bicknell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Mmoh vs B. Bicknell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 16 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 3:0:26 | Average Match Time | 3:0:26 |
| 61% (77/126) | 1st Serve % | 63% (64/102) |
| 68% (52/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (39/64) |
| 37% (18/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (18/38) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 35% (6/17) |
| 44% (45/102) | Return Points Win % | 44% (56/126) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Mmoh Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 1-6 6-4 4-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
B. Bicknell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||

M. Mmoh vs B. Bicknell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.60% (303/223) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.88% (124/94) |
| 55.82% (695/550) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.67% (280/223) |
| 52.26% (6168/5634) | Games Win/Loss | 51.92% (2475/2292) |
| 59.56% (190/129) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.15% (85/54) |
| 45.45% (30/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.05% (38/35) |
| 62.07% (72/44) | Indoor Hard W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 44.00% (11/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 2299 | Aces Total | 620 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1720 | Total Double Faults | 668 |
| 1:36:31 | Average Match Time | 1:26:12 |
| 487.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.86 |
| 66% (22581/34382) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8612/13200) |
| 70% (15777/22581) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5842/8612) |
| 49% (5729/11801) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2294/4587) |
| 42% (1424/3425) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (525/1227) |
| 39% (13488/34515) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5078/12968) |
| 43.64% (24/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 26.92% (7/19) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 50.62% (41/40) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.95% (184/113) | Challenger W/L | 48.24% (41/44) |
| 70.15% (47/20) | Futures W/L | 63.78% (81/46) |
| 60% (289/482) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (119/209) |
| 33% (10/30) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (92/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (32/67) |
| 55% (90/165) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (38/74) |
| 84% (307/259) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (125/102) |
| 15% (307/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (125/23) |
| 20% (219/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (93/22) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025

Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Alafia Ayeni Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
